WPC2 < #1 04U. % 1m 0j 0  0 C !UU!t FL!$UrUU!U B!H !T ~ H@ 2%!W!t 2nb!!!$!( )4) L)"?_+Hh {( U$  <6X9`+CourierX# e37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(xr$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#2 e(  0  )3  0 (# (#(9!2$ U!  W Ӏ  0  ($    J/9> `H  `(  $  Ӏ  9     ` Tennantv.CivilServiceCom.XXXX53Ԁ77Cal.App.2d489,175P.2d568.'     0 .   HB  $  Ӏ  2     ` JudicialCouncilTenthBiennialReportp134.   $  Ӏ  5     ` 127,140,supra./9> `8t> `/9> `/9> ` d  $  Ӏ  4     ` SeePUBLICOFFICERSandEMPLOYEES,(2ded,PUBLIC  OFFICERS) >  $  Ӏ  8     ` BodinsonMfg.Co.v.CaliforniaEmploymentCom.XXXX53Ԁ17Cal2d  321,109P.2d935.Wheretheenablingstatutesgoverningtheadministrativeagencycontainprovisionsforappealwhichareunconstitutional,thecourtsaffordreviewundertheappropriateperogativewrit.SeeXq XXXMojaveRiverIrrg.Dist.v.SuperiorCourtXXSXXqԀ2020Cal ` 717,2626P.724. |  $  Ӏ  7     ` SeeTAXPAYER'SACTIONS  $  Ӏ  6     ` DivisionofAdministrativeProcedure2dBiennialReport,  p24. >  $  Ӏ  8     ` BodinsonMfg.Co.v.CaliforniaEmploymentCom.XXXX53Ԁ17Cal2d  321,109P.2d935.Wheretheenablingstatutesgoverningtheadministrativeagencycontainprovisionsforappealwhichareunconstitutional,thecourtsaffordreviewundertheappropriateperogativewrit.SeeXq XXXMojaveRiverIrrg.Dist.v.SuperiorCourtXXSXXqԀ2020Cal ` 717,2626P.724.  $  Ӏ  2     ` JudicialCouncilTenthBiennialReportp134. (  $  Ӏ  3     ` Theseaspectsofjudicialcontrolaretreatedinother  articles.SeePUBLICOFFICERSANDEMPLOYEES(2ded,PUBLICOFFICERS);ASSAULTANDOTHERWILLFULTORTS(2ded,TORTS)  $  Ӏ  4     ` SeePUBLICOFFICERSandEMPLOYEES,(2ded,PUBLIC  OFFICERS)  $  Ӏ  9     ` Tennantv.CivilServiceCom.XXXX53Ԁ77Cal.App.2d489,175P.2d568.   $  Ӏ  5     ` 127,140,supra. (  $  Ӏ  3     ` Theseaspectsofjudicialcontrolaretreatedinother  articles.SeePUBLICOFFICERSANDEMPLOYEES(2ded,PUBLICOFFICERS);ASSAULTANDOTHERWILLFULTORTS(2ded,TORTS)  $  Ӏ  6     ` DivisionofAdministrativeProcedure2dBiennialReport,  p24. |  $  Ӏ  7     ` SeeTAXPAYER'SACTIONS6)Lh#|V"AHOZq~}E? <//NA^2RP@@NL "AHOZq~}E? <//NA^2RP@@NL "BIP[r?=//Nh &@FR@FL "u'4:^W4WWWii4FFWW4W4WWWWWWWWWWW44WWWWiiiiiiiiiFWiiziiiiiiiziziiWFWFWW4WiWiWFii4Fi4ziWiiWWFiizWiWF4FWWWWWWWWWWiiWiWiWiWiWzziWiWiWiWiWF4F4F4F4iiiWiWiWiWziziziziiiiWiiiWiWiiiiiiiWiWiWiWiWiWiWiiiWiWiWiWiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiF4F4F4F4Wiii4i4i4i4i4iiiiiiiiiWiWiWiWiWiWiWiWiWiFiFiFzizizizizizizziiWWWWWWiii4iiiWiWiFiiiiiiiWziiWF44iW/,W/WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNWWWWWWWWWWizWWWWWWWWiiWWFWWiWFWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW^WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWiWWW4WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWi"u'4:^_9___ss9LL__9_9___________99____sssssssssL_ssssssssssss_L_L__9_s_s_Lss9Ls9s_ss__Lss_s_L9L__________ss_s_s_s_s_s_s_s_s_s_L9L9L9L9sss_s_s_s_sssssss_sss_s_sssssss_s_s_s_s_s_s_sss_s_s_s_ssssssssssssssssL9L9L9L9_sss9s9s9s9s9sssssssss_s_s_s_s_s_s_s_s_sLsLsLssssssss______sss9sss_s_sLsssssss_ss_L99s_/0_/________________________________________________N__________s________ss__L__s_L____________________^_____________________________s___9________________________________________________________s"AHOZq~}E? <//NA^2RP@@NL "AHOZq~}E? <//NA^2RP@@NL "AHOZq~}E? <//NA^2RP@@NL "u'4:^rErrrE[[rrErErrrrrrrrrrrEErrrr[rr[r[rrErrr[E[Errr[rr[E[rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr[E[E[E[Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr[E[E[E[ErEEEEErrrrrrrrr[[[rrrrrrErr[rr[EEr/:r/rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrNrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr[rrr[rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr^rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrErrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"u'4:^rErrrE[[rrErErrrrrrrrrrrEErrrr[rr[r[rrErrr[E[Errr[rr[E[rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr[E[E[E[Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr[E[E[E[ErEEEEErrrrrrrrr[[[rrrrrrErr[rr[EEr/:r/rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrNrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr[rrr[rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr^rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrErrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"AHOZq~}E? <//NA^2RP@@NL %'-./<6X9`+Couriere<6X9`+"CourierItalic<9p`+2Courier 10RomanSpeedo:\  p`$Roman Scalable<9`+Prestige#6X9`+Couriers#9`+Prestige:6Xap`:Sans Serif ScalableItalic<9`+$PrestigeItalic'8?xxxhhXx53{T(o?xxxhh/XxLi0\\\,,j\OgoX3XhhXy`8`hh`=xxxhhXx]*?FFFhh#XF5 6=FFFhhRXF-&sCshhXsT.sCshhXsq=xxxhhXxesL!<hhhLxX<hhhٱX$hhhx` $hhhEpson LQ-870LX$EPLQ870.PRSC:\PSFONTSHh { U!  W %  @L/CALIFORNIAJURISPRUDENCE@5%  THIRDEDITION VI.COURTREVIEWOF,ORRELIEFAGAINST,ACTIONOFADMINISTRATIVE  AGENCY A.  Generally. `  OgXX53 Og 248.  Ingeneral  q X Ԁ(inpartbeginningwithparagraph3)  @   Thecommonlawremediesagainstadministrativeofficersforabuseofpower,whilelittleusedinCaliforniaandoflimitedpracticaleffectiveness,#    2      ׀areneverthelessavailabletoonewhois H   legallywrongedbyadministrativeaction.*X$X    3      ׀Judicialpowerto `  controlstateofficersgenerallyistreatedelsewhere;x&x    4      ׀and (  judicialpowertocontroltheexerciseofquasilegislativeaction)    5         hasbeentreatedinpriorsections.Historicallyandbyvirtueoftheirinherentnature,taxesandjudicialreviewoftheactionoftaxingbodiesinassessingandequalizingtaxescompriseaspecialcategoryofadministrativelaw,!` +`     6      ׀andjudicialreviewoftheaction  ofsuchbodiesistreatedelsewhere. ,     7          Anenablingactisnotnecessarilyinvalidbecauseitdoesnotspecificallyprovideforjudicialreview."H H     8      ׀Butwherethe h legislaturehasbystatuteimposedreasonableconditionsprecedenttosuchreview,theseconditionsshouldbestrictlycompliedwith.(((    9          Administrativeagencies"haveonlysuchpowersashavebeenconferredonthem,expresslyorbyimplication,byconstitutionor P statute."( Ferdingv.StatePersonnelBd. ,71Cal.2d96,103,77  Cal.Rptr.224,453P.2d728; UnitedStatesF.&G.Co.vSuperior x Court ,214Cal.468,471,6P.2d243."Anadministrativeagency, @ therefore,mustactwithinthepowersconferreduponitbylawandmaynotvalidlyactinexcessofsuchpowers.[Citations.]"( Ferdigv.StatePersonnelBd .,supra,atp.104.)Accordingly,it  iswellsettledthat"whenanadministrativeagencyactsinexcessof,orinviolation,ofthepowersconferreduponit,itsactionthustakenisvoid."( Ferdigv.StatePersonnelBd .,supra,atp.  @ 104.SeeAylwardv.StateBoardetc.Examiners,31Cal.2d833,839,192P.2d929.) CityAndCountyOfSanFranciscov.Padilla     (1972)23Cal.App.3d,388,400,100Cal.Rptr.223.  Sincethisjurisdictionalquestionwasnotraiseduntilthereviewstageinthesuperiorcourt,themunicipalagenciesdidnothaveoccasiontopassupontheissue.Atthehearinginthesuperiorcourt,evidenceoutsidetherecordcouldnotbeadduced( CodeofCiv.Proc. ,Sec.1094.5,subd.(d),becausethe 0  substantialevidenceruleofreviewappliedaswehavenotedearlier.Itis,therefore,appropriatetoreferthecausebacktothemunicipalagencyfortheirdeterminationoftheissue(Cal.AdministrativeMandamus(Cont.Ed.Bar.)supra,Sec.5.4,p.37).*** Mumawv.CityofGlendale (1969)270Cal.App.2d454,461,76 h Cal.Rptr.245.